Reflection#1 Ideal Birthday Experience

-

This reflection will follow the Gibbs reflective cycle. Future reflections will follow the Ranning model of reflection.

Description - What happened?
By following the steps given in the worksheet, I interviewed a classmate and designed an “ideal birthday experience” for her. This included finding out exactly what the client needed and gathering insights to define a problem statement and later creating 3 preliminary sketches of possible solutions based on the problem statement. The 3rd drawing happened to be the closest to the client's “ideal experience” so it was used as the base idea for the final prototype. It was presented with a simple 9 step flow chart to portray the chronological events of the birthday experience. Questions, what worked, and additional ideas were collected and documented.
Feelings - What were you thinking and feeling?
I have to say that the first step of the process was the most difficult for me, and I struggled a lot on trying to gain empathy because I don’t really know what exactly birthday experiences are supposed to be like, in general. On the same note, I also had trouble coming up with responses for what my “ideal birthday experience” would be like, as I was hit with some questions that I have never thought of before.
Evaluation - What was good and bad about the experience?
The worst part of the experience was having to think of an ideal birthday experience because I never really considered a “birthday” as such a spiritual day, and hence I never had any idea what I might consider an ideal experience. What went well was when the prototypes I came up with resulted in responses that led me to eliminate or emphasize certain ideas to create a better final product.

Analysis - What sense can you make of the situation?
I need to be more specific with the questions that I ask in that they must be more effective at grabbing the big idea of what exactly the client is looking for. I also need to work on improving my empathy skills to be able to work with problems that I myself have never faced before.
Conclusion - What else could you have done?
If more time were given, I would have used the newly designed ideal birthday experience and talk to
the client again to further identify what can be made better to fit the client's needs. I believe more rounds of reiteration can produce a much better final product.
Action Plan - If it arose again, what would you do?
Next time in a similar situation, I would ask better questions that would be able to hit the source of the client's needs. Questions that would reach deeper into the client's thoughts can reveal a larger problem or a completely different problem that might need to be solved by the product.

Popular posts from this blog

Reflection#5 Project1 Interviews

-
Image
This reflection follows the Ranning model of reflection. What Happened? We came up with interview questions and reached out to members of the school communities to find out what they think about the way students buy and sell used textbooks at PAS. We then analyzed the collected information and identified trends and took note of information that we did not expect. Think and feel - What were you thinking and feeling? I was thinking that we could also do a survey via google forums and not just the interviews. I felt like the interviews were taking up too much time (approx 7min each) and we could've gotten more data if we also used alternative methods. Evaluate - what was good and bad about the experience? What went well was that our interviewees gave helpful information on what they thought, and even revealed new information that we were surprised about. What was bad was that we interviewed only a certain type of student, and our responses do not reflect the though
Read more

Reflection#4 Marshmallow Challenge 2

-
Image
This reflection follows the Ranning model of reflection. What Happened? We did the marshmallow challenge again. Think and feel - What were you thinking and feeling? This was the second time doing this so we felt that we would be able to do this better than last time. I thought that we could take what went well and what did not go well last time and come up with a better way to do it this time. I was hoping that we would use an assembly line sort of system to build with more efficiency. Evaluate - what was good and bad about the experience? This time we used the same structure that we used last time, with slight differences. But that did not happen until we finished arguing, this time for a longer duration of time. This time, some people believed that we need to switch to a new structure design, while some people thought that we could improve on the design we had last time. In the end, we didn't have a choice but to make what we made last time, with small improvi
Read more

Project 2 Self Assessment

-
PAS MS/HS Design Thinking Project Rubric Evaluation Criteria Exemplary Competency Proficient Competency Foundational Competency 1. Discover How do I find, design, and approach problems or challenges? Make Observations (1.1) I can take a highly broad, deep, and inquisitive approach to perceiving details (e.g. different perspectives, disciplinary lenses, or conditions), and keep detailed records in generating ideas for inquiry. Pose Questions (1.2) I can generate a large number and variety of open-ended questions for inquiry. Find Information (1.3) I can find relevant and credible information through academic research and/or user-focused/empathetic methods. Make Observations (1.1) I can notice and record substantive information to generate ideas for inquiry. P ose Questions (1.2) I can generate a large number of questions for inquiry. Find Information (1.3) I can find information through academic research and/or user-focused/empathet
Read more